IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

436

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6 Waste Disposal
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
LM0031 # 07 Y:2002 07 2002 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $6,421 $11,800 Implemented
SD0292 # 04 Y:2002 04 2002 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $19,200 $2,000 Implemented
SD0291 # 04 Y:2002 04 2002 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $22,460 $1,500 Implemented
SD0291 # 05 Y:2002 05 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,452 $0 Implemented
UF0294 # 09 Y:2002 09 2002 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $11,700 $7,000 Implemented
AM0411 # 06 Y:2002 06 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,440 $600 Implemented
IA0285 # 07 Y:2002 07 2002 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $5,018 $7,500 Implemented
LL0124 # 06 Y:2001 06 2001 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $83,474 $92,279 Implemented
AS0312 # 06 Y:2001 06 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $779 $60 Implemented
LM0020 # 05 Y:2001 05 2001 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $1,575 $300 Implemented
TA0014 # 02 Y:2001 02 2001 USE FILTER AND DRYING OVEN TO REDUCE SLUDGE VOLUME $8,100 $11,960 Implemented
WI0406 # 01 Y:2001 01 2001 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $8,841 $0 Implemented
WV0228 # 11 Y:2001 11 2001 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $850 $2,547 Implemented
AS0309 # 07 Y:2001 07 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,413 $60 Implemented
WI0405 # 04 Y:2001 04 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,138 $0 Implemented
WV0225 # 14 Y:2001 14 2001 USE FILTER AND DRYING OVEN TO REDUCE SLUDGE VOLUME $1,001 $2,500 Implemented
WV0225 # 13 Y:2001 13 2001 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $275 $1,044 Implemented
UF0280 # 06 Y:2001 06 2001 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $2,427 $8,000 Implemented
AS0305 # 05 Y:2001 05 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,588 $110 Implemented
WV0218 # 11 Y:2001 11 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $18,480 $9,000 Implemented
MI0015 # 05 Y:2001 05 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,179 $5,000 Implemented
LM0015 # 07 Y:2001 07 2001 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $8,944 $11,800 Implemented
WI0402 # 10 Y:2001 10 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,181 $0 Implemented
AS0301 # 04 Y:2001 04 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,032 $110 Implemented
SD0283 # 07 Y:2001 07 2001 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS $9,044 $18,000 Implemented