IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

65

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
CO0444 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $230 $0 Implemented
WI0355 # 04 Y:1999 04 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,752 $0 n/a
CO0442 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,352 $0 Not Implemented
MO0258 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,460 $0 Not Implemented
NV0132 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,012 $0 Implemented
WI0354 # 03 Y:1999 03 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,465 $0 Implemented
CO0441 # 07 Y:1999 07 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $430 $0 Not Implemented
AS0255 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,779 $120 Not Implemented
WI0351 # 02 Y:1999 02 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $7,993 $0 Implemented
AS0253 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,296 $60 Not Implemented
AS0253 # 07 Y:1999 07 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,611 $1,060 Implemented
WI0349 # 07 Y:1999 07 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,649 $0 Implemented
AS0252 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,018 $80 Not Implemented
MO0255 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $726 $0 Not Implemented
CO0438 # 03 Y:1999 03 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $388 $0 Not Implemented
AS0251 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $6,862 $30 Not Implemented
AS0251 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $87,240 $10,375 Implemented
HO0203 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $487 $500 Not Implemented
AS0250 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $720 $30 Not Implemented
SD0223 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $10,800 $0 Implemented
UL0217 # 04 Y:1999 04 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $14,811 $4,765 Not Implemented
AS0249 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,775 $90 Not Implemented
CO0436 # 03 Y:1999 03 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,460 $0 Implemented
CO0435 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $210 $134 Implemented
CO0434 # 04 Y:1999 04 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $380 $60 n/a