Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
The IAC Activity Map breaks down activity by area and state for the selected criteria.
| SIC | 2653 | Corrugated And Solid Fiber Boxes |
|---|
Note: Matching assessments must represent 5 or more separate locations to generate a map.
| State | Assessments Asmts | Recommendations Recc | Recommended Savings | Implemented Recommendations Imped | Implemented Savings | Implementation Rate Imp Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 6 | 49 | $480,417 | 26 | $180,385 | 53.1% |
| AZ | 6 | 59 | $3,518,165 | 24 | $920,454 | 46.2% |
| CA | 25 | 194 | $5,083,460 | 91 | $1,493,029 | 53.8% |
| CO | 13 | 111 | $877,092 | 51 | $171,460 | 49.5% |
| CT | 1 | 5 | $34,335 | 5 | $34,335 | 100.0% |
| DE | 1 | 6 | $34,093 | 2 | $2,785 | 33.3% |
| FL | 16 | 149 | $3,180,014 | 66 | $1,270,275 | 50.4% |
| GA | 7 | 44 | $235,394 | 25 | $129,917 | 56.8% |
| IA | 8 | 73 | $837,779 | 34 | $257,347 | 46.6% |
| ID | 3 | 21 | $202,573 | 2 | $6,880 | 28.6% |
| IL | 20 | 211 | $2,197,087 | 67 | $667,550 | 38.7% |
| IN | 3 | 18 | $41,303 | 11 | $33,187 | 61.1% |
| KS | 11 | 134 | $880,512 | 53 | $255,858 | 44.2% |
| KY | 7 | 37 | $648,142 | 4 | $23,522 | 14.8% |
| LA | 5 | 35 | $5,479,515 | 19 | $310,653 | 54.3% |
| MA | 8 | 56 | $1,484,060 | 24 | $150,604 | 42.9% |
| MD | 1 | 5 | $58,456 | - | - | - |
| ME | 3 | 20 | $116,143 | 7 | $64,469 | 35.0% |
| MI | 12 | 97 | $751,971 | 49 | $246,281 | 55.1% |
| MN | 6 | 53 | $886,940 | 28 | $146,115 | 52.8% |
| MO | 17 | 156 | $1,078,243 | 95 | $466,855 | 60.9% |
| MS | 2 | 13 | $72,620 | 2 | $4,192 | 50.0% |
| NC | 7 | 55 | $379,689 | 24 | $157,290 | 43.6% |
| NE | 4 | 22 | $262,586 | 8 | $10,899 | 50.0% |
| NJ | 5 | 37 | $822,332 | 15 | $80,394 | 40.5% |
| NY | 12 | 101 | $701,278 | 51 | $407,070 | 50.5% |
| OH | 14 | 94 | $937,728 | 45 | $437,682 | 47.9% |
| OK | 6 | 40 | $417,582 | 24 | $60,833 | 60.0% |
| OR | 3 | 22 | $181,498 | 11 | $135,635 | 50.0% |
| PA | 18 | 166 | $2,314,115 | 84 | $1,354,670 | 50.6% |
| SC | 2 | 13 | $414,661 | 4 | $72,125 | 57.1% |
| SD | 1 | 6 | $22,088 | 3 | $8,725 | 50.0% |
| TN | 12 | 79 | $1,379,815 | 27 | $839,409 | 45.8% |
| TX | 28 | 220 | $2,206,968 | 118 | $1,165,809 | 59.6% |
| UT | 2 | 16 | $337,038 | 3 | $4,085 | 42.9% |
| VA | 5 | 29 | $507,539 | 16 | $276,658 | 55.2% |
| WA | 1 | 9 | $56,524 | 4 | $14,106 | 44.4% |
| WI | 9 | 68 | $466,276 | 32 | $160,210 | 47.1% |
| WV | 2 | 24 | $196,990 | 14 | $92,152 | 58.3% |