IAC logo
IAC Assessment: UL0231
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: UL0231
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center University of Louisville
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Rolled Carbon Steel
NAICS n/a
SIC 3312 - Blast Furnaces And Steel Mills
Sales $10,000,000-$50,000,000
# of Employees 80
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 55,000
Annual Production 0 Units
Production Hrs. Annual 6,732
Location (State) KY
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $44,936 1,831,770 kWh $0.02
Electricity Demand $41,755 4,506 kW-months/year $9.27
Natural Gas $19,729 4,721 MMBtu $4.18
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $114,608
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $40,658 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Solid Waste (non-haz) One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Solid Waste (non-haz) One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ lb $ $
01: 2.4231 REDUCE THE PRESSURE OF COMPRESSED AIR TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED Savings:
$2,275
Cost:
$101
$1,307 53,341 $968 104 - - - - $1,307
53,341
kWh
$968
104
kW-months/year
-
-
lb
-
-
$
02: 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL Savings:
$757
Cost:
-
- - - - $757 9,600 - - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
$757
9,600
lb
-
-
$
03: 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL Savings:
$876
Cost:
-
- - - - - - $876 - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
lb
$876
-
$
04: 4.5140 RE-ARRANGE EQUIPMENT LAYOUT TO REDUCE HANDLING COSTS Savings:
$36,750
Cost:
$23,166
- - - - - - $36,750 - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
lb
$36,750
-
$
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$40,658
Cost:
$23,267
$1,307 53,341 $968 104 $757 9,600 $37,626 - $1,307
53,341
kWh
$968
104
kW-months/year
$757
9,600
lb
$37,626
-
$
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
-
Cost:
-
- - - - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
lb
-
-
$
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ lb $ $
Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Solid Waste (non-haz) One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Solid Waste (non-haz) One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost