IAC logo
IAC Assessment: AS0244
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: AS0244
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center Arizona State University
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Dairy and Non-dairy creamer product
NAICS n/a
SIC 2023 - Dry, Condensed, Evaporated Products
Sales $10,000,000-$50,000,000
# of Employees 65
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 30,000
Annual Production 1,380,000,000 Pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 8,664
Location (State) AZ
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $179,618 3,276,084 kWh $0.05
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $232,863
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $396,410 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Water Disposal Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes Increase in Production Electricity Usage Water Disposal Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes Increase in Production
$ kWh $ Tgal $ lb $ $ $ %
01: 2.7135 INSTALL OCCUPANCY SENSORS Savings:
$522
Cost:
$1,800
$522 9,672 - - - - - - - - $522
9,672
kWh
-
-
Tgal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
%
02: 2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS Savings:
$2,441
Cost:
$9,669
$2,441 44,549 - - - - - - - - $2,441
44,549
kWh
-
-
Tgal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
%
03: 2.4231 REDUCE THE PRESSURE OF COMPRESSED AIR TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED Savings:
$16,388
Cost:
$120
$16,388 299,238 - - - - - - - - $16,388
299,238
kWh
-
-
Tgal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
%
04: 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL Savings:
$15,768
Cost:
$480
- - - - $15,768 - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
Tgal
$15,768
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
%
05: 4.2310 PURCHASE EQUIPMENT INSTEAD OF LEASING Savings:
$14,400
Cost:
$50,000
- - - - - - $14,400 - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
Tgal
-
-
lb
$14,400
-
$
-
-
%
06: 4.1110 ADD EQUIPMENT/ OPERATORS TO REDUCE PRODUCTION BOTTLENECK Savings:
$346,891
Cost:
$10,000
- - $(-26,442) (-16,830,169) - - - - $373,333 - -
-
kWh
$(-26,442)
(-16,830,169)
Tgal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
$373,333
-
%
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$396,410
Cost:
$72,069
$19,351 353,459 $(-26,442) (-16,830,169) $15,768 - $14,400 - $373,333 - $19,351
353,459
kWh
$(-26,442)
(-16,830,169)
Tgal
$15,768
-
lb
$14,400
-
$
$373,333
-
%
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
-
Cost:
-
- - - - - - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
Tgal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
%
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ Tgal $ lb $ $ $ %
Electricity Usage Water Disposal Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes Increase in Production Electricity Usage Water Disposal Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes Increase in Production