IAC Recommendation Types

Select a Center

Arizona State University

Case Western Reserve University

Colorado School of Mines

Colorado State University

Georgia Institute of Technology

Indiana University-Purdue University

Lehigh University

Louisiana State University

Michigan State University

Mississippi State

Oklahoma State University

Oregon State University

San Diego State University

San Francisco State University

San Jose State University

Syracuse University

Tennessee Technological University

Texas A&M, College Station

University of Alabama

University of California, Irvine

University of Connecticut

University of Dayton

University of Delaware

University of Florida

University of Illinois, Chicago

University of Louisville

University of Massachusetts

University of Miami

University of Missouri-Columbia

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

University of North Carolina, Charlotte

University of North Texas

University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

University of Utah

University of Washington

University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

West Virginia University

IAC Recommendation Types

Sponsored by:

IAC Recommendation Types

The Assessment Recommendation Codes ARC is a system for classifying recommendations. [Manual]

Center

State

Year

SIC

NAICS

Reset

TOP	ARC	Description	Recommendations Reccs	Recommended $ Savings	Average Payback (yrs)	Implementation Rate Imp Rate
back	2.xxxx	2.xxxx ENERGY MANAGEMENT	136,197	$1,859,507,885	1.8	51.0%
back	2.4xxx	2.4xxx Motor Systems	46,014	$370,278,579	1.4	57.0%
back	2.41xx	2.41xx MOTORS	16,284	$149,612,305	2.5	53.0%
	2.413x	2.413x Hardware	5,902	$38,529,658	3.8	62.0%

	2.4131	2.4131 SIZE ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR PEAK OPERATING EFFICIENCY	386	$5,930,467	1.6	36.9%
	2.4133	2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS	5,488	$31,612,565	3.9	64.0%
	2.4134	2.4134 REPLACE ELECTRIC MOTOR WITH FOSSIL FUEL ENGINE	27	$983,619	2.1	8.0%