Select a Center

Arizona State University
Boise State University
Case Western Reserve University
Clemson University
Colorado State University
Georgia Institute of Technology
Indiana University-Purdue University
Lehigh University
Louisiana State University
North Carolina State
Oklahoma State University
Oregon State University
San Diego State University
San Francisco State University
Syracuse University
Tennessee Technological University
Texas A&M, College Station
University of Alabama
University of Dayton
University of Delaware
University of Florida
University of Illinois, Chicago
University of Kentucky
University of Massachusetts
University of Miami
University of Missouri-Columbia
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
University of Utah
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
West Virginia University
IAC logo
IAC Recommendation Types
Sponsored by:
IAC logo
IAC Recommendation Types
The Assessment Recommendation Codes ARC is a system for classifying recommendations. [Manual]
TOP ARC Description Recommendations Reccs Recommended $ Savings Average Payback (yrs) Implementation Rate Imp Rate
back 2.xxxx 2.xxxx ENERGY MANAGEMENT 130,258 $1,733,777,029 1.8 50.9%
back 2.4xxx 2.4xxx Motor Systems 43,920 $341,084,518 1.4 57.1%
back 2.41xx 2.41xx MOTORS 15,542 $138,337,729 2.6 53.3%
2.413x 2.413x Hardware 5,811 $37,344,824 3.8 62.2%
2.4131 2.4131 REPLACE OVER-SIZE MOTORS AND PUMPS WITH OPTIMUM SIZE 377 $5,818,538 1.6 37.5%
2.4133 2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS 5,407 $30,542,667 4.0 64.1%
2.4134 2.4134 REPLACE ELECTRIC MOTOR WITH FOSSIL FUEL ENGINE 27 $983,619 2.1 8.0%