IAC logo
IAC Assessment: CO0416
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: CO0416
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center Colorado State University
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product electronic communication components
NAICS n/a
SIC 3663 - Radio & Tv Communications Equipment
Sales $50,000,000-$100,000,000
# of Employees 220
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 75,000
Annual Production 1,003,000 Pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,240
Location (State) NM
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $91,189 2,055,100 kWh $0.04
Electricity Fees $67,386 - $ -
Natural Gas $6,761 1,624 MMBtu $4.16
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $168,676
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $73,540 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Electricity Fees Natural Gas Solid Waste (haz) Personnel Changes Administrative Changes Primary Raw Material Electricity Usage Electricity Fees Natural Gas Solid Waste (haz) Personnel Changes Administrative Changes Primary Raw Material
$ kWh $ $ $ MMBtu $ lb $ $ $ $ $ $
01: 2.7316 CENTRALIZE CONTROL OF EXHAUST FANS TO ENSURE THEIR SHUTDOWN, OR ESTABLISH PROGRAM TO ENSURE MANUAL SHUTDOWN Savings:
$2,840
Cost:
$6,600
$370 9,379 - - $2,470 581 - - - - - - - - $370
9,379
kWh
-
-
$
$2,470
581
MMBtu
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
02: 2.3131 RESCHEDULE PLANT OPERATIONS OR REDUCE LOAD TO AVOID PEAKS Savings:
$490
Cost:
-
- - $490 - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
kWh
$490
-
$
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
03: 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL Savings:
$1,060
Cost:
-
- - - - - - $1,060 322 - - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
$
-
-
MMBtu
$1,060
322
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
04: 4.1220 DEVELOP STANDARD PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE INTERNAL YIELDS Savings:
$69,150
Cost:
$75,000
$(-1,000) (-18,464) - - - - - - $3,900 - $(-2,000) - $68,250 - $(-1,000)
(-18,464)
kWh
-
-
$
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
lb
$3,900
-
$
$(-2,000)
-
$
$68,250
-
$
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$73,540
Cost:
$81,600
$(-630) (-9,085) $490 - $2,470 581 $1,060 322 $3,900 - $(-2,000) - $68,250 - $(-630)
(-9,085)
kWh
$490
-
$
$2,470
581
MMBtu
$1,060
322
lb
$3,900
-
$
$(-2,000)
-
$
$68,250
-
$
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
-
Cost:
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
$
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ $ $ MMBtu $ lb $ $ $ $ $ $
Electricity Usage Electricity Fees Natural Gas Solid Waste (haz) Personnel Changes Administrative Changes Primary Raw Material Electricity Usage Electricity Fees Natural Gas Solid Waste (haz) Personnel Changes Administrative Changes Primary Raw Material