IAC logo
IAC Assessment: SF0079
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: SF0079
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center San Francisco State University
Assessment Year 1996
Principal Product Chocolate Candy
NAICS n/a
SIC 2064 - Candy & Other Confectionery Products
Sales $5,000,000-$10,000,000
# of Employees 35
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 14,000
Annual Production 720,000 Pounds
Production Hrs. Annual 2,080
Location (State) CA
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $28,519 282,532 kWh $0.10
Electricity Demand $3,551 800 kW-months/year $4.44
Natural Gas $3,401 527 MMBtu $6.45
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $43,640
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $11,581 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $4,247
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Natural Gas Other Liquid (non-haz) Solid Waste (non-haz) Electricity Usage Natural Gas Other Liquid (non-haz) Solid Waste (non-haz)
$ kWh $ MMBtu $ gal $ lb
01: 2.7142 UTILIZE HIGHER EFFICIENCY LAMPS AND/OR BALLASTS Savings:
$3,316
Cost:
$10,806
$3,316 25,498 - - - - - - $3,316
25,498
kWh
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
02: 2.1311 REPLACE ELECTRICALLY-OPERATED EQUIPMENT WITH FOSSIL FUEL EQUIPMENT Savings:
$5,240
Cost:
$9,533
$6,921 60,961 $(-1,681) (-260) - - - - $6,921
60,961
kWh
$(-1,681)
(-260)
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
03: 2.4231 REDUCE THE PRESSURE OF COMPRESSED AIR TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED Savings:
$118
Cost:
$40
$118 1,172 - - - - - - $118
1,172
kWh
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
04: 3.4111 USE CLOSED CYCLE PROCESS TO MINIMIZE WASTE WATER PRODUCTION Savings:
$813
Cost:
$911
$415 18,757 - - $398 93,600 - - $415
18,757
kWh
-
-
MMBtu
$398
93,600
gal
-
-
lb
05: 3.6193 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS Savings:
$2,094
Cost:
$6,395
- - - - - - $2,094 - -
-
kWh
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
$2,094
-
lb
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$11,581
Cost:
$27,685
$10,770 106,388 $(-1,681) (-260) $398 93,600 $2,094 - $10,770
106,388
kWh
$(-1,681)
(-260)
MMBtu
$398
93,600
gal
$2,094
-
lb
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
$4,247
Cost:
$11,757
$3,849 45,427 - - $398 93,600 - - $3,849
45,427
kWh
-
-
MMBtu
$398
93,600
gal
-
-
lb
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ MMBtu $ gal $ lb
Electricity Usage Natural Gas Other Liquid (non-haz) Solid Waste (non-haz) Electricity Usage Natural Gas Other Liquid (non-haz) Solid Waste (non-haz)