IAC logo
IAC Assessment: SF0183
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: SF0183
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center San Francisco State University
Assessment Year 2000
Principal Product Chocolate Truffels
NAICS n/a
SIC 2066 - Chocolate And Cocoa Products
Sales $10,000,000-$50,000,000
# of Employees 110
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 98,000
Annual Production 1,500,000 Pounds
Production Hrs. Annual 2,125
Location (State) CA
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $36,847 451,934 kWh $0.08
Electricity Demand $10,128 2,292 kW-months/year $4.42
Natural Gas $6,777 1,088 MMBtu $6.23
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $83,207
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $25,640 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ MMBtu $ lb $ $
01: 2.7134 USE PHOTOCELL CONTROLS Savings:
$718
Cost:
$1,080
$550 6,741 $168 38 - - - - - - $550
6,741
kWh
$168
38
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
lb
-
-
$
02: 2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS Savings:
$255
Cost:
$638
$212 2,638 $43 10 - - - - - - $212
2,638
kWh
$43
10
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
lb
-
-
$
03: 2.7135 INSTALL OCCUPANCY SENSORS Savings:
$188
Cost:
$480
$144 1,758 $44 10 - - - - - - $144
1,758
kWh
$44
10
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
lb
-
-
$
04: 2.7134 USE PHOTOCELL CONTROLS Savings:
$397
Cost:
$1,400
$304 3,810 $93 21 - - - - - - $304
3,810
kWh
$93
21
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
lb
-
-
$
05: 3.6193 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS Savings:
$16,379
Cost:
$1,915
$(-87) (-1,172) - - - - $18,341 - $(-1,875) - $(-87)
(-1,172)
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
$18,341
-
lb
$(-1,875)
-
$
06: 2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS Savings:
$7,703
Cost:
$654
$7,858 96,424 $2,404 544 $(-2,559) (-411) - - - - $7,858
96,424
kWh
$2,404
544
kW-months/year
$(-2,559)
(-411)
MMBtu
-
-
lb
-
-
$
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$25,640
Cost:
$6,167
$8,981 110,199 $2,752 623 $(-2,559) (-411) $18,341 - $(-1,875) - $8,981
110,199
kWh
$2,752
623
kW-months/year
$(-2,559)
(-411)
MMBtu
$18,341
-
lb
$(-1,875)
-
$
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
-
Cost:
-
- - - - - - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
lb
-
-
$
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ MMBtu $ lb $ $
Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes