IAC logo
IAC Assessment: SF0271
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: SF0271
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center San Francisco State University
Assessment Year 2003
Principal Product Asphalt Roofing Shingles
NAICS 324122 - Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Manufacturing
SIC 2952 - Asphalt Felts And Coatings
Sales $10,000,000-$50,000,000
# of Employees 79
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 267,800
Annual Production 0 Units
Production Hrs. Annual 6,960
Location (State) CA
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $568,833 4,467,600 kWh $0.13
Electricity Demand $106,196 9,684 kW-months/year $10.97
Natural Gas $460,999 112,442 MMBtu $4.10
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $1,452,665
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $256,127 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $92,387
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Administrative Changes Primary Raw Material Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Administrative Changes Primary Raw Material
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ MMBtu $ $ $ $
01: 2.4236 ELIMINATE LEAKS IN INERT GAS AND COMPRESSED AIR LINES/ VALVES Savings:
$7,393
Cost:
$420
$7,393 71,642 - - - - - - - - $7,393
71,642
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
-
-
$
02: 2.4231 REDUCE THE PRESSURE OF COMPRESSED AIR TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED Savings:
$1,964
Cost:
$567
$1,964 19,035 - - - - - - - - $1,964
19,035
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
-
-
$
03: 2.7134 USE PHOTOCELL CONTROLS Savings:
$2,225
Cost:
$2,760
$1,381 13,380 $844 77 - - - - - - $1,381
13,380
kWh
$844
77
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
-
-
$
04: 2.7142 UTILIZE HIGHER EFFICIENCY LAMPS AND/OR BALLASTS Savings:
$23,846
Cost:
$38,640
$20,152 195,270 $3,694 337 - - - - - - $20,152
195,270
kWh
$3,694
337
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
-
-
$
05: 2.7142 UTILIZE HIGHER EFFICIENCY LAMPS AND/OR BALLASTS Savings:
$5,167
Cost:
$8,360
$4,367 42,317 $800 73 - - - - - - $4,367
42,317
kWh
$800
73
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
-
-
$
06: 2.4146 USE ADJUSTABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE OR MULTIPLE SPEED MOTORS ON EXISTING SYSTEM Savings:
$8,193
Cost:
$15,000
$6,580 63,761 $1,613 147 - - - - - - $6,580
63,761
kWh
$1,613
147
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
-
-
$
07: 2.2414 USE WASTE HEAT FROM HOT FLUE GASES TO PREHEAT Savings:
$142,307
Cost:
$525,000
- - - - $142,307 34,794 - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
$142,307
34,794
MMBtu
-
-
$
-
-
$
08: 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL Savings:
$56,959
Cost:
$350
- - - - - - $56,959 - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
$56,959
-
$
-
-
$
09: 4.131 MODIFY PROCESS TO REDUCE MATERIAL USE/COST Savings:
$8,073
Cost:
$20,578
- - - - - - - - $8,073 - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
$8,073
-
$
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$256,127
Cost:
$611,675
$41,837 405,405 $6,951 634 $142,307 34,794 $56,959 - $8,073 - $41,837
405,405
kWh
$6,951
634
kW-months/year
$142,307
34,794
MMBtu
$56,959
-
$
$8,073
-
$
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
$92,387
Cost:
$42,737
$30,890 299,327 $4,538 414 - - $56,959 - - - $30,890
299,327
kWh
$4,538
414
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
$56,959
-
$
-
-
$
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ MMBtu $ $ $ $
Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Administrative Changes Primary Raw Material Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Administrative Changes Primary Raw Material