IAC logo
IAC Assessment: UD0614
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: UD0614
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center University of Dayton
Assessment Year 2001
Principal Product Thin Film Color Coating on and in Glass
NAICS n/a
SIC 3231 - Products Of Purchased Glass
Sales $1,000,000-$5,000,000
# of Employees 45
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 35,850
Annual Production 10,000,000 Pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,800
Location (State) OH
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $37,593 1,555,920 kWh $0.02
Electricity Demand $84,420 6,000 kW-months/year $14.07
Natural Gas $46,142 7,867 MMBtu $5.87
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $168,155
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $358,590 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $59,436
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Water Disposal Personnel Changes Primary Product Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Water Disposal Personnel Changes Primary Product
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ Tgal $ $ $ $
01: 3.2176 INCREASE USE OF AUTOMATION Savings:
$277,500
Cost:
$100,000
- - - - - - $201,600 - $75,900 - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
Tgal
$201,600
-
$
$75,900
-
$
02: 4.6520 REPLACE EXISTING EQUIPMENT WITH MORE SUITABLE SUBSTITUTES Savings:
$53,184
Cost:
$30,570
- - - - - - $29,888 - $23,296 - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
Tgal
$29,888
-
$
$23,296
-
$
03: 3.4111 USE CLOSED CYCLE PROCESS TO MINIMIZE WASTE WATER PRODUCTION Savings:
$11,618
Cost:
$23,000
$(-1,137) (-49,440) $(-1,739) (-124) $14,494 2,995,392 - - - - $(-1,137)
(-49,440)
kWh
$(-1,739)
(-124)
kW-months/year
$14,494
2,995,392
Tgal
-
-
$
-
-
$
04: 2.3131 RESCHEDULE PLANT OPERATIONS OR REDUCE LOAD TO AVOID PEAKS Savings:
$10,036
Cost:
-
- - $12,916 924 - - $(-2,880) - - - -
-
kWh
$12,916
924
kW-months/year
-
-
Tgal
$(-2,880)
-
$
-
-
$
05: 2.6218 TURN OFF EQUIPMENT WHEN NOT IN USE Savings:
$6,252
Cost:
-
$1,339 58,200 $4,913 349 - - - - - - $1,339
58,200
kWh
$4,913
349
kW-months/year
-
-
Tgal
-
-
$
-
-
$
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$358,590
Cost:
$153,570
$202 8,760 $16,090 1,149 $14,494 2,995,392 $228,608 - $99,196 - $202
8,760
kWh
$16,090
1,149
kW-months/year
$14,494
2,995,392
Tgal
$228,608
-
$
$99,196
-
$
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
$59,436
Cost:
$30,570
$1,339 58,200 $4,913 349 - - $29,888 - $23,296 - $1,339
58,200
kWh
$4,913
349
kW-months/year
-
-
Tgal
$29,888
-
$
$23,296
-
$
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ Tgal $ $ $ $
Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Water Disposal Personnel Changes Primary Product Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Water Disposal Personnel Changes Primary Product