Select a Center

Arizona State University
Boise State University
Case Western Reserve University
Clemson University
Colorado State University
Georgia Institute of Technology
Indiana University-Purdue University
Lehigh University
Louisiana State University
North Carolina State
Oklahoma State University
Oregon State University
San Diego State University
San Francisco State University
Syracuse University
Tennessee Technological University
Texas A&M, College Station
University of Alabama
University of Dayton
University of Delaware
University of Florida
University of Illinois, Chicago
University of Kentucky
University of Massachusetts
University of Miami
University of Missouri-Columbia
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
University of Utah
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
West Virginia University
IAC logo
IAC Recommendation Types
Sponsored by:
EERE AMO
IAC logo
IAC Recommendation Types
Due to University and State restrictions, IAC assessment activities at your local center may be on hold.
Contact your local center for more details on operating status and available services.

Click here for details about Coronavirus (COVID-19) Recovery Support programs
The Assessment Recommendation Codes ARC is a system for classifying recommendations. [Manual]
Reset
TOP ARC Description Recommendations Reccs Recommended $ Savings Average Payback (yrs) Implementation Rate Imp Rate
back 2.xxxx 2.xxxx ENERGY MANAGEMENT 128,904 $1,713,378,720 1.8 50.9%
back 2.5xxx 2.5xxx Industrial Design 533 $21,198,628 1.5 34.9%
back 2.51xx 2.51xx SYSTEMS 533 $21,198,628 1.5 34.9%
2.519x 2.519x Miscellaneous 258 $14,509,065 1.4 33.2%
2.5191 2.5191 MODIFY DYE BECK 23 $894,296 1.8 30.4%
2.5192 2.5192 MODIFY TEXTILE DRYERS 30 $996,787 0.7 30.0%
2.5193 2.5193 CONVERT FROM BATCH TO CONTINUOUS OPERATION 3 $170,150 1.0 33.3%
2.5194 2.5194 REDESIGN PROCESS 151 $8,264,766 1.5 33.8%
2.5195 2.5195 CHANGE PRODUCT DESIGN TO REDUCE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS 32 $1,572,195 0.8 29.0%
2.5196 2.5196 USE SMALL NUMBER OF HIGH OUTPUT UNITS INSTEAD OF MANY SMALL INEFFICIENT UNITS 19 $2,610,871 2.2 44.4%