IAC logo
IAC Assessment: LT0099
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: LT0099
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center Louisiana Tech
Assessment Year 1987
Principal Product PARBOILED RICE
NAICS n/a
SIC 2044 - Rice Milling
Sales $100,000,000-$500,000,000
# of Employees 250
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 0
Annual Production 10,000,000 Bushels
Production Hrs. Annual 8,400
Location (State) AR
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $938,287 19,803,928 kWh $0.05
Natural Gas $511,634 181,346 MMBtu $2.82
Other Energy $129,000 129,000 MMBtu $1.00
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $1,578,921
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $263,380 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $72,080
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Natural Gas Other Energy Administrative Changes Electricity Usage Natural Gas Other Energy Administrative Changes
$ kWh $ MMBtu $ MMBtu $ $
01: 2.2511 INSULATE BARE EQUIPMENT Savings:
$40,000
Cost:
$12,600
- - $40,000 14,200 - - - - -
-
kWh
$40,000
14,200
MMBtu
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
02: 2.3414 BURN WASTE TO PRODUCE STEAM TO DRIVE A STEAM TURBINE GENERATOR SET AND USE STEAM EXHAUST FOR HEAT Savings:
$109,000
Cost:
$230,000
$410,000 10,300,117 - - $(-301,000) (-301,000) - - $410,000
10,300,117
kWh
-
-
MMBtu
$(-301,000)
(-301,000)
MMBtu
-
-
$
03: 2.3191 USE DEMAND CONTROLLER OR LOAD SHEDDER Savings:
$30,300
Cost:
$20,000
$30,300 - - - - - - - $30,300
-
kWh
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
04: 2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS Savings:
$1,780
Cost:
$2,500
$1,780 44,549 - - - - - - $1,780
44,549
kWh
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
05: 2.2693 USE WASTE HEAT STEAM FOR ABSORPTION REFRIGERATION Savings:
$82,300
Cost:
$217,000
$86,900 2,300,703 - - - - $(-4,600) - $86,900
2,300,703
kWh
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
MMBtu
$(-4,600)
-
$
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$263,380
Cost:
$482,100
$528,980 12,645,369 $40,000 14,200 $(-301,000) (-301,000) $(-4,600) - $528,980
12,645,369
kWh
$40,000
14,200
MMBtu
$(-301,000)
(-301,000)
MMBtu
$(-4,600)
-
$
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
$72,080
Cost:
$35,100
$32,080 44,549 $40,000 14,200 - - - - $32,080
44,549
kWh
$40,000
14,200
MMBtu
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
$
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ MMBtu $ MMBtu $ $
Electricity Usage Natural Gas Other Energy Administrative Changes Electricity Usage Natural Gas Other Energy Administrative Changes