IAC logo
IAC Assessment: SF0228
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: SF0228
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center San Francisco State University
Assessment Year 2002
Principal Product Emulsion Polymers
NAICS n/a
SIC 2821 - Plastics Materials And Resins
Sales $50,000,000-$100,000,000
# of Employees 75
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 750,000
Annual Production 0 Units
Production Hrs. Annual 8,568
Location (State) CA
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $535,261 7,848,116 kWh $0.07
Natural Gas $31,154 12,729 MMBtu $2.45
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $574,815
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $511,472 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $35,802
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes Electricity Usage Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes
$ kWh $ lb $ $
01: 2.7124 MAKE A PRACTICE OF TURNING OFF LIGHTS WHEN NOT NEEDED Savings:
$10,037
Cost:
-
$10,037 80,196 - - - - $10,037
80,196
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
02: 2.4322 USE OR REPLACE WITH ENERGY EFFICIENT SUBSTITUTES Savings:
$19,528
Cost:
$8,550
$19,528 163,472 - - - - $19,528
163,472
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
03: 2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS Savings:
$16,476
Cost:
$6,382
$16,476 128,470 - - - - $16,476
128,470
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
04: 2.2622 REPLACE EXISTING CHILLER WITH HIGH EFFICIENCY MODEL Savings:
$122,694
Cost:
$120,000
$122,694 1,027,068 - - - - $122,694
1,027,068
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
05: 2.7132 INSTALL TIMERS ON LIGHT SWITCHES IN LITTLE USED AREAS Savings:
$565
Cost:
$480
$565 4,524 - - - - $565
4,524
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
06: 2.7142 UTILIZE HIGHER EFFICIENCY LAMPS AND/OR BALLASTS Savings:
$19,326
Cost:
$23,370
$19,326 158,131 - - - - $19,326
158,131
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
07: 2.5123 REDUCE FLUID FLOW RATES Savings:
$35,747
Cost:
$56,700
$35,747 268,088 - - - - $35,747
268,088
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
08: 2.5123 REDUCE FLUID FLOW RATES Savings:
$6,808
Cost:
$10,340
$6,808 51,997 - - - - $6,808
51,997
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
09: 2.5123 REDUCE FLUID FLOW RATES Savings:
$2,958
Cost:
$5,070
$2,958 23,100 - - - - $2,958
23,100
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
10: 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL Savings:
$89,821
Cost:
$24,680
- - $89,821 - - - -
-
kWh
$89,821
-
lb
-
-
$
11: 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL Savings:
$177,582
Cost:
$186,000
- - $177,582 - - - -
-
kWh
$177,582
-
lb
-
-
$
12: 3.6193 INSTALL EQUIPMENT (eg COMPACTOR) TO REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS Savings:
$7,230
Cost:
$19,300
- - $7,230 - - - -
-
kWh
$7,230
-
lb
-
-
$
13: 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL Savings:
$2,700
Cost:
$5,000
- - - - $2,700 - -
-
kWh
-
-
lb
$2,700
-
$
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$511,472
Cost:
$465,872
$234,139 1,905,046 $274,633 - $2,700 - $234,139
1,905,046
kWh
$274,633
-
lb
$2,700
-
$
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
$35,802
Cost:
$29,752
$35,802 286,601 - - - - $35,802
286,601
kWh
-
-
lb
-
-
$
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ lb $ $
Electricity Usage Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes Electricity Usage Solid Waste (non-haz) Administrative Changes