IAC logo
IAC Assessment: MO0157
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: MO0157
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center University of Missouri, Rolla
Assessment Year 1995
Principal Product sleeper boxes
NAICS n/a
SIC 3713 - Truck And Bus Bodies
Sales $50,000,000-$100,000,000
# of Employees 258
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 240,000
Annual Production 9,000 Units
Production Hrs. Annual 7,854
Location (State) MO
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $148,056 2,049,238 kWh $0.07
Natural Gas $16,652 3,867 MMBtu $4.31
LPG $42,187 11,022 MMBtu $3.83
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $206,895
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $60,403 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $17,630
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Solid Waste (non-haz) Electricity Usage Solid Waste (non-haz)
$ kWh $ lb
01: 2.4231 REDUCE THE PRESSURE OF COMPRESSED AIR TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED Savings:
$3,416
Cost:
$80
$3,416 76,788 - - $3,416
76,788
kWh
-
-
lb
02: 2.4236 ELIMINATE LEAKS IN INERT GAS AND COMPRESSED AIR LINES/ VALVES Savings:
$2,692
Cost:
$320
$2,692 66,823 - - $2,692
66,823
kWh
-
-
lb
03: 2.4221 INSTALL COMPRESSOR AIR INTAKES IN COOLEST LOCATIONS Savings:
$3,686
Cost:
$1,790
$3,686 81,184 - - $3,686
81,184
kWh
-
-
lb
04: 2.4314 USE SYNTHETIC LUBRICANT Savings:
$855
Cost:
$265
$855 19,050 - - $855
19,050
kWh
-
-
lb
05: 2.7142 UTILIZE HIGHER EFFICIENCY LAMPS AND/OR BALLASTS Savings:
$4,812
Cost:
$10,944
$4,812 107,268 - - $4,812
107,268
kWh
-
-
lb
06: 2.7142 UTILIZE HIGHER EFFICIENCY LAMPS AND/OR BALLASTS Savings:
$2,525
Cost:
$3,768
$2,525 56,565 - - $2,525
56,565
kWh
-
-
lb
07: 2.7142 UTILIZE HIGHER EFFICIENCY LAMPS AND/OR BALLASTS Savings:
$201
Cost:
-
$201 4,982 - - $201
4,982
kWh
-
-
lb
08: 2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS Savings:
$2,306
Cost:
$5,704
$2,306 54,220 - - $2,306
54,220
kWh
-
-
lb
09: 2.4146 USE ADJUSTABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE OR MULTIPLE SPEED MOTORS ON EXISTING SYSTEM Savings:
$1,557
Cost:
$1,809
$1,557 13,775 - - $1,557
13,775
kWh
-
-
lb
10: 2.4111 UTILIZE ENERGY-EFFICIENT BELTS AND OTHER IMPROVED MECHANISMS Savings:
$553
Cost:
-
$553 13,775 - - $553
13,775
kWh
-
-
lb
11: 3.1192 REDUCE SCRAP PRODUCTION Savings:
$37,800
Cost:
$1,250
- - $37,800 42,000 -
-
kWh
$37,800
42,000
lb
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$60,403
Cost:
$25,930
$22,603 494,430 $37,800 42,000 $22,603
494,430
kWh
$37,800
42,000
lb
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
$17,630
Cost:
$22,791
$17,630 403,867 - - $17,630
403,867
kWh
-
-
lb
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ lb
Electricity Usage Solid Waste (non-haz) Electricity Usage Solid Waste (non-haz)