IAC logo
IAC Assessment: BD0266
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
IAC Assessment: BD0266
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
IAC Center Bradley University
Assessment Year 2004
Principal Product Thermal Spray Job Shop
NAICS 332812 - Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers
SIC 3479 - Metal Coating And Allied Services
Sales $10,000,000-$50,000,000
# of Employees 60
Plant Area (Sq.Ft.) 65,000
Annual Production 40,000 Pounds
Production Hrs. Annual 6,240
Location (State) MO
Source Yearly Cost Usage Unit Unit Cost
Electricity Usage $167,704 2,557,600 kWh $0.07
Electricity Demand $15,677 7,258 kW-months/year $2.16
Natural Gas $42,257 6,330 MMBtu $6.68
TOTAL ENERGY COSTS $240,709
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $26,562 *Non-energy impacts
included in savings.
See recommendations below
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $24,100
#|Description Savings
Cost
Status Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Other Liquid (haz) Solid Waste (non-haz) Personnel Changes Primary Raw Material Ancillary Material Cost Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Other Liquid (haz) Solid Waste (non-haz) Personnel Changes Primary Raw Material Ancillary Material Cost
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ MMBtu $ gal $ lb $ $ $ $ $ $
01: 2.1331 BURN A LESS EXPENSIVE GRADE OF FUEL Savings:
$260
Cost:
$11,000
- - - - $260 39 - - - - - - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
$260
39
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
02: 3.8132 USE LESS TOXIC AND VOLATILE SOLVENT SUBSTITUTES Savings:
$6,225
Cost:
$4,930
$5,850 120,362 $375 174 - - - - - - - - - - - - $5,850
120,362
kWh
$375
174
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
03: 2.4236 ELIMINATE LEAKS IN INERT GAS AND COMPRESSED AIR LINES/ VALVES Savings:
$8,992
Cost:
$600
$8,281 170,373 $711 328 - - - - - - - - - - - - $8,281
170,373
kWh
$711
328
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
04: 2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS Savings:
$1,081
Cost:
$2,765
$956 19,685 $125 57 - - - - - - - - - - - - $956
19,685
kWh
$125
57
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
05: 2.7135 INSTALL OCCUPANCY SENSORS Savings:
$703
Cost:
$1,425
$520 10,706 $127 59 - - - - - - $11 - $45 - - - $520
10,706
kWh
$127
59
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
$11
-
$
$45
-
$
-
-
$
06: 2.4111 UTILIZE ENERGY-EFFICIENT BELTS AND OTHER IMPROVED MECHANISMS Savings:
$504
Cost:
$220
$493 10,160 $11 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - $493
10,160
kWh
$11
6
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
07: 2.7142 UTILIZE HIGHER EFFICIENCY LAMPS AND/OR BALLASTS Savings:
$382
Cost:
$323
$188 3,853 $13 6 - - - - - - $87 - $94 - - - $188
3,853
kWh
$13
6
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
$87
-
$
$94
-
$
-
-
$
08: 2.4133 USE MOST EFFICIENT TYPE OF ELECTRIC MOTORS Savings:
$329
Cost:
$510
$309 6,354 $20 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - $309
6,354
kWh
$20
9
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
09: 3.8124 INSTALL FLOATING COVERS ON TANKS OF VOLATILE MATERIALS TO REDUCE EVAPORATION Savings:
$2,462
Cost:
$1,575
- - - - - - $2,462 3,040 - - - - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
$2,462
3,040
gal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
10: 3.5248 SEPARATE AND RECYCLE SCRAP METAL TO FOUNDRY OR FOR SALE Savings:
$1,020
Cost:
$96
- - - - - - - - $1,020 20,000 - - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
$1,020
20,000
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
11: 4.6520 REPLACE EXISTING EQUIPMENT WITH MORE SUITABLE SUBSTITUTES Savings:
$3,200
Cost:
$96
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - $3,200 - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
-
-
$
-
-
$
$3,200
-
$
12: 3.4111 USE CLOSED CYCLE PROCESS TO MINIMIZE WASTE WATER PRODUCTION Savings:
$1,404
Cost:
$2,500
- - - - - - - - - - $1,404 - - - - - -
-
kWh
-
-
kW-months/year
-
-
MMBtu
-
-
gal
-
-
lb
$1,404
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
TOTAL RECOMMENDED Savings:
$26,562
Cost:
$26,040
$16,597 341,493 $1,382 640 $260 39 $2,462 3,040 $1,020 20,000 $1,502 - $139 - $3,200 - $16,597
341,493
kWh
$1,382
640
kW-months/year
$260
39
MMBtu
$2,462
3,040
gal
$1,020
20,000
lb
$1,502
-
$
$139
-
$
$3,200
-
$
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED Savings:
$24,100
Cost:
$24,465
$16,597 341,493 $1,382 640 $260 39 - - $1,020 20,000 $1,502 - $139 - $3,200 - $16,597
341,493
kWh
$1,382
640
kW-months/year
$260
39
MMBtu
-
-
gal
$1,020
20,000
lb
$1,502
-
$
$139
-
$
$3,200
-
$
Savings
Cost
$ kWh $ kW-months/year $ MMBtu $ gal $ lb $ $ $ $ $ $
Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Other Liquid (haz) Solid Waste (non-haz) Personnel Changes Primary Raw Material Ancillary Material Cost Electricity Usage Electricity Demand Natural Gas Other Liquid (haz) Solid Waste (non-haz) Personnel Changes Primary Raw Material Ancillary Material Cost