IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

335

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 2.2628 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
DL0122 # 02 Y:2014 02 2014 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $16,470 $4,000 Not Implemented
LE0373 # 02 Y:2014 02 2014 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $35,793 $130,000 Implemented
NC0507 # 01 Y:2014 01 2014 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $13,167 $23,000 Not Implemented
OR0625 # 02 Y:2014 02 2014 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $5,751 $5,908 Not Implemented
NC0505 # 02 Y:2014 02 2014 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $14,010 $20,000 Not Implemented
DL0120 # 08 Y:2014 08 2014 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $52,252 $500,000 Not Implemented
MI0253 # 01 Y:2013 01 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $174,761 $506,800 Not Implemented
SU0349 # 05 Y:2013 05 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $882,762 $552,244 Not Implemented
SF0439 # 15 Y:2013 15 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $19,319 $118,398 Not Implemented
OK0866 # 03 Y:2013 03 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $19,312 $184,080 Not Implemented
OR0610 # 07 Y:2013 07 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $6,621 $24,248 Not Implemented
UD0884 # 08 Y:2013 08 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $8,876 $0 Implemented
OK0861 # 10 Y:2013 10 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $53,906 $518,400 Not Implemented
OK0856 # 02 Y:2013 02 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $5,800 $11,700 Not Implemented
BS0015 # 07 Y:2013 07 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $93 $1,073 Not Implemented
OK0858 # 05 Y:2013 05 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $32,018 $268,800 Not Implemented
OK0842 # 05 Y:2013 05 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $242,685 $1,298,400 Not Implemented
UD0873 # 09 Y:2013 09 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $6,285 $12,000 Not Implemented
MA0704 # 03 Y:2013 03 2013 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $2,329 $5,680 Not Implemented
OR0600 # 01 Y:2012 01 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $14,559 $2,500 Not Implemented
MI0231 # 11 Y:2012 11 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $1,120 $1,498 Not Implemented
UD0867 # 09 Y:2012 09 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $23,710 $0 Not Implemented
UD0867 # 10 Y:2012 10 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $1,097 $0 Implemented
UD0865 # 13 Y:2012 13 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $15,846 $24,600 Not Implemented
UD0865 # 12 Y:2012 12 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $20,832 $25,000 Not Implemented