IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

335

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 2.2628 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
OR0692 # 02 Y:2017 02 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $2,636 $3,060 Not Implemented
MI0323 # 05 Y:2017 05 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $8,024 $26,400 Not Implemented
MI0322 # 03 Y:2017 03 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $171,697 $338,000 Implemented
MI0320 # 01 Y:2017 01 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $58,668 $31,800 Not Implemented
SF0506 # 01 Y:2017 01 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $2,307 $0 Implemented
NC0597 # 05 Y:2017 05 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $35,128 $100,000 Not Implemented
NC0597 # 04 Y:2017 04 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $5,207 $14,400 Not Implemented
UD0970 # 01 Y:2017 01 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $570 $0 Implemented
MI0311 # 02 Y:2017 02 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $33,524 $10,000 Not Implemented
MI0310 # 01 Y:2017 01 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $66,228 $330,000 Not Implemented
MI0308 # 01 Y:2017 01 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $39,159 $40,000 Implemented
NC0588 # 02 Y:2017 02 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $4,845 $38,000 Not Implemented
MI0307 # 02 Y:2017 02 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $10,877 $56,000 Not Implemented
UA0175 # 02 Y:2017 02 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $42,445 $13,900 Implemented
MI0304 # 03 Y:2016 03 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $16,987 $25,335 Not Implemented
MI0302 # 01 Y:2016 01 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $12,170 $29,740 Implemented
NC0568 # 08 Y:2016 08 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $8,890 $25,230 Not Implemented
MI0299 # 01 Y:2016 01 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $39,996 $70,000 Not Implemented
MI0297 # 02 Y:2016 02 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $65,063 $200,000 Not Implemented
OK0938 # 08 Y:2016 08 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $4,294 $5,000 Not Implemented
MI0295 # 02 Y:2016 02 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $26,678 $80,000 Not Implemented
SD0528 # 10 Y:2016 10 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $1,512 $200 Not Implemented
UD0945 # 01 Y:2016 01 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $5,063 $8,000 Implemented
MI0291 # 01 Y:2016 01 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $49,064 $180,000 Not Implemented
NC0559 # 07 Y:2016 07 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $34,146 $10,000 Implemented