IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

351

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 2.2628 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
MI0310 # 01 Y:2017 01 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $66,228 $330,000 Not Implemented
MI0308 # 01 Y:2017 01 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $39,159 $40,000 Implemented
NC0588 # 02 Y:2017 02 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $4,845 $38,000 Not Implemented
MI0307 # 02 Y:2017 02 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $10,877 $56,000 Not Implemented
UA0175 # 02 Y:2017 02 2017 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $42,445 $13,900 Implemented
MI0304 # 03 Y:2016 03 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $16,987 $25,335 Not Implemented
MI0302 # 01 Y:2016 01 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $12,170 $29,740 Implemented
NC0568 # 08 Y:2016 08 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $8,890 $25,230 Not Implemented
MI0299 # 01 Y:2016 01 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $39,996 $70,000 Not Implemented
MI0297 # 02 Y:2016 02 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $65,063 $200,000 Not Implemented
OK0938 # 08 Y:2016 08 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $4,294 $5,000 Not Implemented
MI0295 # 02 Y:2016 02 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $26,678 $80,000 Not Implemented
SD0528 # 10 Y:2016 10 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $1,512 $200 Not Implemented
UD0945 # 01 Y:2016 01 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $5,063 $8,000 Implemented
MI0291 # 01 Y:2016 01 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $49,064 $180,000 Not Implemented
NC0559 # 07 Y:2016 07 2016 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $34,146 $10,000 Implemented
SU0399 # 05 Y:2015 05 2015 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $8,686 $33,817 Not Implemented
NC0552 # 03 Y:2015 03 2015 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $49,347 $200,000 Not Implemented
NC0552 # 04 Y:2015 04 2015 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $13,541 $30,000 Not Implemented
DL0152 # 06 Y:2015 06 2015 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $13,980 $92,000 Not Implemented
CO0715 # 02 Y:2015 02 2015 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $3,300 $11,250 n/a
MI0284 # 01 Y:2015 01 2015 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $77,529 $180,000 Implemented
IA0538 # 02 Y:2015 02 2015 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $9,403 $11,520 Not Implemented
MI0283 # 01 Y:2015 01 2015 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $75,489 $140,000 Not Implemented
OK0922 # 06 Y:2015 06 2015 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $10,800 $22,080 Not Implemented