IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

424

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
CO0433 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $340 $0 Not Implemented
CO0433 # 07 Y:1999 07 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $220 $20 Not Implemented
BD0128 # 10 Y:1999 10 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $7,800 $500 Not Implemented
GT0658 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $216 $0 Not Implemented
AS0244 # 04 Y:1999 04 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $15,768 $480 n/a
SD0214 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $800 $0 Implemented
SD0214 # 06 Y:1999 06 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,832 $1,000 Implemented
WI0336 # 01 Y:1999 01 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $192,652 $0 Not Implemented
AS0243 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $7,800 $80 Implemented
AS0242 # 09 Y:1999 09 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $480 $60 Not Implemented
ME0234 # 08 Y:1998 08 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $150 $0 Not Implemented
ME0234 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,887 $3,000 Not Implemented
CO0431 # 05 Y:1999 05 1999 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $370 $0 Not Implemented
AS0240 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,896 $60 Implemented
OK0561 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,911 $0 Not Implemented
UL0208 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $24,060 $0 Not Implemented
OR0335 # 04 Y:1998 04 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $310 $0 Implemented
AS0238 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,014 $60 Not Implemented
KU0509 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $7,350 $30 Implemented
NV0118 # 07 Y:1998 07 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,830 $0 Not Implemented
NV0117 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,032 $1,000 Implemented
AS0236 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $120 $60 Not Implemented
AS0237 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $6,136 $60 Not Implemented
AS0235 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $670 $60 Not Implemented
AS0229 # 11 Y:1998 11 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,584 $60 Not Implemented