IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

44

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
UL0172 # 07 Y:1996 07 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $22,850 $0 Not Implemented
UD0509 # 05 Y:1996 05 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,320 $0 Not Implemented
UD0509 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,442 $0 Not Implemented
CO0380 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,250 $0 Not Implemented
CO0378 # 05 Y:1996 05 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $500 $0 Implemented
UL0170 # 04 Y:1996 04 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,360 $200 Implemented
OR0285 # 01 Y:1996 01 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $33,432 $0 Implemented
OD0073 # 05 Y:1996 05 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,723 $20,400 Implemented
UL0169 # 04 Y:1996 04 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,300 $0 Not Implemented
AS0194 # 09 Y:1996 09 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,256 $0 Implemented
UD0502 # 01 Y:1996 01 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $372,300 $800,000 Implemented
WI0280 # 04 Y:1996 04 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,440 $0 Not Implemented
NV0059 # 05 Y:1996 05 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,340 $0 n/a
TN0593 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,506 $0 Implemented
WI0274 # 01 Y:1996 01 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $8,100 $0 Not Implemented
UF0156 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,404 $0 Implemented
OD0062 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $25,196 $0 Not Implemented
MO0178 # 08 Y:1996 08 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,000 $8,000 Not Implemented
SD0154 # 09 Y:1996 09 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,250 $4,000 Implemented
WI0267 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $6,670 $0 n/a
WI0267 # 08 Y:1996 08 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,040 $0 n/a
MA0360 # 04 Y:1996 04 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $420 $0 Implemented
OR0264 # 03 Y:1996 03 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,900 $0 Implemented
TN0585 # 04 Y:1996 04 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,575 $0 Not Implemented
NV0055 # 07 Y:1996 07 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,080 $8,170 Not Implemented