IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

424

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
UF0130 # 11 Y:1995 11 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $29,006 $285,418 Not Implemented
UD0469 # 04 Y:1995 04 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,522 $1,000 Not Implemented
MA0344 # 10 Y:1995 10 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,920 $0 Not Implemented
UL0133 # 06 Y:1995 06 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $15,000 $18,720 Not Implemented
NC0052 # 07 Y:1995 07 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,850 $0 Not Implemented
HO0112 # 06 Y:1995 06 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,942 $500 Implemented
GT0556 # 08 Y:1995 08 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,460 $0 Not Implemented
AM0245 # 09 Y:1995 09 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $560 $0 Implemented
AM0245 # 10 Y:1995 10 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $130 $0 Implemented
NC0051 # 07 Y:1995 07 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,190 $0 Implemented
NC0051 # 08 Y:1995 08 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $24,714 $18,000 Not Implemented
AM0238 # 06 Y:1995 06 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $9,350 $0 Implemented
NV0023 # 05 Y:1995 05 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $31,162 $100,000 Not Implemented
UL0118 # 08 Y:1995 08 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,800 $5,000 Not Implemented
MA0310 # 08 Y:1994 08 1994 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,800 $0 Implemented
OR0217 # 05 Y:1994 05 1994 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,470 $0 Implemented
OD0009 # 01 Y:1994 01 1994 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $9,540 $7,075 Not Implemented
KU0372 # 02 Y:1992 02 1992 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $91,322 $0 Not Implemented
AM0143 # 01 Y:1992 01 1992 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,500 $19,165 Not Implemented
AM0144 # 01 Y:1992 01 1992 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $30,000 $0 Not Implemented
RU0132 # 07 Y:1991 07 1991 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $26,390 $0 Not Implemented
AS0003 # 03 Y:1990 03 1990 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $28,500 $7,500 Not Implemented
LT0142 # 01 Y:1989 01 1989 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $214,983 $77,904 Not Implemented
CO0101 # 09 Y:1987 09 1987 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $9,000 $0 Not Implemented