IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

335

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 2.2628 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
MA0695 # 04 Y:2012 04 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $6,220 $11,500 Implemented
DL0086 # 03 Y:2012 03 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $1,390 $280 Not Implemented
MZ0076 # 03 Y:2012 03 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $59,645 $27,000 Not Implemented
SF0408 # 04 Y:2012 04 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $3,344 $4,267 Not Implemented
UD0848 # 06 Y:2012 06 2012 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $3,962 $1,000 Not Implemented
MI0212 # 01 Y:2011 01 2011 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $22,567 $75,000 Not Implemented
IA0471 # 06 Y:2011 06 2011 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $1,974 $1,500 Implemented
MA0674 # 01 Y:2011 01 2011 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $11,498 $17,900 Not Implemented
GT0882 # 03 Y:2011 03 2011 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $28,143 $70,000 Not Implemented
MI0207 # 02 Y:2011 02 2011 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $76,417 $150,000 Not Implemented
TT0062 # 09 Y:2011 09 2011 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $23,000 $50,000 Not Implemented
WV0423 # 08 Y:2011 08 2011 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $428 $183 Implemented
IA0462 # 04 Y:2011 04 2011 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $59,656 $20,000 Not Implemented
WV0417 # 06 Y:2010 06 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $3,780 $4,485 Not Implemented
IA0458 # 08 Y:2010 08 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $26,636 $22,000 Implemented
MI0196 # 01 Y:2010 01 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $157,910 $102,500 Implemented
WV0414 # 07 Y:2010 07 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $2,505 $14,000 Not Implemented
WV0413 # 04 Y:2010 04 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $59,435 $55,000 Implemented
MI0192 # 05 Y:2010 05 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $19,608 $35,500 Not Implemented
WV0405 # 07 Y:2010 07 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $1,180 $10,000 Not Implemented
UD0818 # 14 Y:2010 14 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $29,159 $0 Not Implemented
UD0816 # 09 Y:2010 09 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $15,412 $0 Implemented
WV0403 # 01 Y:2010 01 2010 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $45,685 $55,000 Implemented
MI0186 # 01 Y:2009 01 2009 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $160,282 $0 Implemented
MI0186 # 03 Y:2009 03 2009 UTILIZE A LESS EXPENSIVE COOLING METHOD $76,266 $28,000 Not Implemented