IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

424

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
NC0081 # 10 Y:1996 10 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,170 $25,000 Not Implemented
NV0055 # 07 Y:1996 07 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,080 $8,170 Not Implemented
OD0056 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $7,826 $8,120 n/a
MA0363 # 07 Y:1996 07 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $410 $0 Implemented
TN0582 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $8,800 $0 Implemented
UF0147 # 07 Y:1996 07 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,994 $0 Implemented
AM0270 # 10 Y:1996 10 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $860 $0 Not Implemented
SD0145 # 08 Y:1996 08 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,780 $0 Implemented
OD0054 # 09 Y:1996 09 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $15,938 $0 Not Implemented
ME0184 # 10 Y:1996 10 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,600 $0 Implemented
HO0128 # 05 Y:1996 05 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,200 $100 Implemented
AM0265 # 01 Y:1996 01 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,100 $750 Implemented
UF0138 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,056 $0 Not Implemented
WI0262 # 04 Y:1996 04 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,280 $0 Implemented
WI0256 # 03 Y:1996 03 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,375 $0 Implemented
OR0256 # 01 Y:1996 01 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,446 $560 Implemented
HO0126 # 06 Y:1996 06 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,430 $0 Not Implemented
UF0139 # 09 Y:1996 09 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $7,200 $0 Not Implemented
UF0137 # 05 Y:1996 05 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $600 $0 Not Implemented
UF0136 # 09 Y:1996 09 1996 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $588 $0 Not Implemented
WI0255 # 10 Y:1995 10 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,100 $0 n/a
WI0250 # 06 Y:1995 06 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,770 $0 Not Implemented
OK0478 # 11 Y:1995 11 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,300 $0 Implemented
SF0073 # 09 Y:1995 09 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,400 $0 Implemented
UF0124 # 08 Y:1995 08 1995 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,700 $0 Implemented