IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

159

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
CO0412 # 08 Y:1998 08 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,260 $0 Implemented
HO0176 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $833 $500 Implemented
AS0223 # 07 Y:1998 07 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,500 $60 Implemented
AS0221 # 07 Y:1998 07 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,400 $30 Implemented
OK0541 # 10 Y:1998 10 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $130 $0 Implemented
TN0626 # 04 Y:1998 04 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,535 $0 Implemented
OD0101 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $33,876 $0 Implemented
OD0101 # 04 Y:1998 04 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $16,127 $0 Implemented
AS0219 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $36 $30 Implemented
AS0218 # 10 Y:1998 10 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $941 $60 Implemented
AS0217 # 10 Y:1998 10 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $15,720 $60 Implemented
AS0217 # 11 Y:1998 11 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $700 $60 Implemented
UF0192 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $36,140 $0 Implemented
CO0404 # 05 Y:1997 05 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $200 $0 Implemented
AM0308 # 02 Y:1997 02 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $6,870 $0 Implemented
IA0183 # 06 Y:1997 06 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,112 $600 Implemented
AS0214 # 09 Y:1997 09 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,811 $60 Implemented
AS0214 # 11 Y:1997 11 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,440 $60 Implemented
AS0212 # 09 Y:1997 09 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $432 $60 Implemented
WI0308 # 04 Y:1997 04 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $10,950 $0 Implemented
CO0393 # 07 Y:1997 07 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $400 $0 Implemented
TN0614 # 04 Y:1997 04 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,875 $0 Implemented
AS0207 # 11 Y:1997 11 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,500 $30 Implemented
AS0205 # 11 Y:1997 11 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,076 $30 Implemented
AS0206 # 06 Y:1997 06 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,352 $30 Implemented