IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

52

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
UL0190 # 06 Y:1997 06 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $230 $0 Not Implemented
CO0405 # 06 Y:1997 06 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $410 $0 Not Implemented
CO0404 # 05 Y:1997 05 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $200 $0 Implemented
CO0402 # 06 Y:1997 06 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $360 $0 Not Implemented
CO0401 # 05 Y:1997 05 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $480 $0 Not Implemented
OD0098 # 04 Y:1997 04 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $421 $0 Not Implemented
AM0308 # 02 Y:1997 02 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $6,870 $0 Implemented
CO0400 # 05 Y:1997 05 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $450 $0 Not Implemented
IA0183 # 06 Y:1997 06 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,112 $600 Implemented
AS0214 # 08 Y:1997 08 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,000 $30 Not Implemented
AS0214 # 09 Y:1997 09 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,811 $60 Implemented
AS0214 # 11 Y:1997 11 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,440 $60 Implemented
AS0213 # 08 Y:1997 08 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,674 $60 Not Implemented
CO0398 # 04 Y:1997 04 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $530 $0 Not Implemented
AS0212 # 09 Y:1997 09 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $432 $60 Implemented
AS0212 # 10 Y:1997 10 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,320 $120 Not Implemented
AS0211 # 09 Y:1997 09 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $750 $30 Not Implemented
AS0211 # 10 Y:1997 10 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $9,840 $60 Not Implemented
WI0308 # 04 Y:1997 04 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $10,950 $0 Implemented
OR0305 # 02 Y:1997 02 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $24,200 $139,000 Not Implemented
CO0394 # 07 Y:1997 07 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,530 $0 Not Implemented
AR0124 # 09 Y:1997 09 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,514 $0 Not Implemented
CO0393 # 07 Y:1997 07 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $400 $0 Implemented
AS0209 # 10 Y:1997 10 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,750 $30 Not Implemented
ND0283 # 07 Y:1997 07 1997 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $625 $275 Not Implemented