IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

62

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
ME0234 # 08 Y:1998 08 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $150 $0 Not Implemented
ME0234 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,887 $3,000 Not Implemented
AS0240 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,896 $60 Implemented
OK0561 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,911 $0 Not Implemented
UL0208 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $24,060 $0 Not Implemented
OR0335 # 04 Y:1998 04 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $310 $0 Implemented
KU0509 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $7,350 $30 Implemented
AS0238 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,014 $60 Not Implemented
NV0118 # 07 Y:1998 07 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,830 $0 Not Implemented
NV0117 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,032 $1,000 Implemented
AS0236 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $120 $60 Not Implemented
AS0237 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $6,136 $60 Not Implemented
AS0235 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $670 $60 Not Implemented
AS0229 # 11 Y:1998 11 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,584 $60 Not Implemented
AS0234 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,384 $60 Implemented
OR0326 # 08 Y:1998 08 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,920 $3,680 Not Implemented
AS0228 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $768 $60 Not Implemented
UD0558 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,200 $0 Implemented
IA0203 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $6,030 $550 Not Implemented
AS0233 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $368 $60 Not Implemented
CO0422 # 07 Y:1998 07 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $400 $130 Implemented
UF0207 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,662 $0 Implemented
AS0231 # 08 Y:1998 08 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $525 $60 Not Implemented
AS0230 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $936 $60 Not Implemented
WI0327 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $528 $800 Implemented