Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
424
matching recommendations| ARC | 3.6192 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL |
|---|
| Row Colors Legend |
|---|
| no implementation information |
| Implemented |
| NOT Implemented |
| ID | # | Year | Products | Savings | Cost | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM0752 # 01 Y:2018 | 01 | 2018 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $79,100 | $11,000 | Implemented |
| TR0002 # 01 Y:2017 | 01 | 2017 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $30,725 | $22,000 | Implemented |
| AM0726 # 02 Y:2017 | 02 | 2017 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $13,960 | $1,200 | Implemented |
| AM0723 # 07 Y:2017 | 07 | 2017 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $3,200 | $0 | Implemented |
| NC0580 # 07 Y:2016 | 07 | 2016 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $1,280 | $1,300 | Not Implemented |
| BS0066 # 04 Y:2015 | 04 | 2015 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $1,249 | $80 | Not Implemented |
| BS0055 # 03 Y:2015 | 03 | 2015 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $7,460 | $221 | Not Implemented |
| IP0036 # 01 Y:2015 | 01 | 2015 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $102,924 | $0 | Not Implemented |
| OR0642 # 06 Y:2015 | 06 | 2015 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $64,347 | $61,077 | Not Implemented |
| IP0029 # 04 Y:2014 | 04 | 2014 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $82,707 | $12,435 | Not Implemented |
| AM0667 # 03 Y:2014 | 03 | 2014 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $4,380 | $249 | Not Implemented |
| UK1407 # 07 Y:2014 | 07 | 2014 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $20,232 | $0 | Not Implemented |
| MI0265 # 11 Y:2014 | 11 | 2014 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $5,236 | $320 | Not Implemented |
| BD0444 # 07 Y:2014 | 07 | 2014 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $465,422 | $19,400 | Not Implemented |
| UA0118 # 04 Y:2014 | 04 | 2014 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $56,812 | $0 | Not Implemented |
| BS0024 # 08 Y:2013 | 08 | 2013 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $187 | $120 | Implemented |
| AM0618 # 01 Y:2012 | 01 | 2012 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $23,700 | $0 | Not Implemented |
| TT0082 # 06 Y:2011 | 06 | 2011 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $2,834 | $1,500 | Not Implemented |
| UD0823 # 11 Y:2010 | 11 | 2010 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $19,629 | $7,500 | Not Implemented |
| UA0053 # 09 Y:2010 | 09 | 2010 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $27,920 | $8,875 | Not Implemented |
| AM0558 # 05 Y:2009 | 05 | 2009 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $2,100 | $0 | Not Implemented |
| AM0558 # 02 Y:2009 | 02 | 2009 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $6,000 | $37,000 | Not Implemented |
| AM0531 # 02 Y:2007 | 02 | 2007 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $7,000 | $100 | Not Implemented |
| AM0526 # 05 Y:2007 | 05 | 2007 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $10,500 | $0 | Not Implemented |
| OR0504 # 03 Y:2006 | 03 | 2006 | USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL | $84,100 | $0 | Not Implemented |