IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

28

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
AS0240 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,896 $60 Implemented
OR0335 # 04 Y:1998 04 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $310 $0 Implemented
KU0509 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $7,350 $30 Implemented
NV0117 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,032 $1,000 Implemented
AS0234 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,384 $60 Implemented
UD0558 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,200 $0 Implemented
CO0422 # 07 Y:1998 07 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $400 $130 Implemented
UF0207 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,662 $0 Implemented
WI0327 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $528 $800 Implemented
SD0202 # 10 Y:1998 10 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,190 $2,000 Implemented
OD0111 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,042 $0 Implemented
TN0636 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $175 $0 Implemented
SD0201 # 05 Y:1998 05 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $22,080 $0 Implemented
CO0414 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $670 $0 Implemented
SD0200 # 11 Y:1998 11 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $6,318 $0 Implemented
CO0412 # 08 Y:1998 08 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,260 $0 Implemented
HO0176 # 09 Y:1998 09 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $833 $500 Implemented
AS0223 # 07 Y:1998 07 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,500 $60 Implemented
AS0221 # 07 Y:1998 07 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,400 $30 Implemented
OK0541 # 10 Y:1998 10 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $130 $0 Implemented
TN0626 # 04 Y:1998 04 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,535 $0 Implemented
OD0101 # 03 Y:1998 03 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $33,876 $0 Implemented
OD0101 # 04 Y:1998 04 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $16,127 $0 Implemented
AS0219 # 06 Y:1998 06 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $36 $30 Implemented
AS0218 # 10 Y:1998 10 1998 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $941 $60 Implemented