IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Sponsored by:
DOE MESC
IAC logo
Search IAC Recommendations
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
IMPORTANT: The grant program operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time, with quarterly reviews.
Learn More
Implementation Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received IAC or Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership assessments between 2018 and 2024, can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations up 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per manufacturer.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.

159

matching recommendations
Reset
ARC 3.6192 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL
Row Colors Legend
no implementation information
Implemented
NOT Implemented
ID # Year Products Savings Cost Status
SU0148 # 04 Y:2002 04 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $31,584 $17,490 Implemented
BD0218 # 16 Y:2002 16 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $7,800 $500 Implemented
SF0245 # 06 Y:2002 06 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,738 $6,972 Implemented
AS0333 # 06 Y:2002 06 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,272 $60 Implemented
UD0652 # 04 Y:2002 04 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $12,960 $504 Implemented
SD0299 # 07 Y:2002 07 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,300 $3,000 Implemented
SD0291 # 05 Y:2002 05 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,452 $0 Implemented
AM0411 # 06 Y:2002 06 2002 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $1,440 $600 Implemented
AS0312 # 06 Y:2001 06 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $779 $60 Implemented
AS0309 # 07 Y:2001 07 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,413 $60 Implemented
WI0405 # 04 Y:2001 04 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,138 $0 Implemented
AS0305 # 05 Y:2001 05 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,588 $110 Implemented
MI0015 # 05 Y:2001 05 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,179 $5,000 Implemented
WV0218 # 11 Y:2001 11 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $18,480 $9,000 Implemented
WI0402 # 10 Y:2001 10 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,181 $0 Implemented
AS0301 # 04 Y:2001 04 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $4,032 $110 Implemented
SF0215 # 11 Y:2001 11 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $219,121 $0 Implemented
AM0397 # 04 Y:2001 04 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $18,400 $0 Implemented
TA0003 # 02 Y:2001 02 2001 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $3,272 $0 Implemented
WI0382 # 05 Y:2000 05 2000 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $5,144 $0 Implemented
AS0284 # 06 Y:2000 06 2000 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $852 $60 Implemented
AS0282 # 07 Y:2000 07 2000 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $2,580 $120 Implemented
AS0282 # 08 Y:2000 08 2000 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $624 $60 Implemented
CO0469 # 05 Y:2000 05 2000 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $730 $50 Implemented
ME0292 # 14 Y:2000 14 2000 USE A LESS EXPENSIVE METHOD OF WASTE REMOVAL $40 $0 Implemented